Hp-pavilion WC807AA-ABZ HPE-130it

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion WC807AA-ABZ HPE-130it (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '21 at 14:32
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 154 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 345 39% 305 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2200 5,007 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Dell(1028 131B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1746 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.4% Average	Lighting 54.6 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 57.3 44% 59.4 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 58.3 Splatting 66.1 53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 519GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 200 200 201 201 175 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.7% Above average	Read 231 Write 223 Mixed 222 SusWrite 182 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 26.6 96% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 411GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 90 89 91 91 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 79.4 Write 75.7 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 86.9 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 69%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 296GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 114 114 114 114 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	60% Good	Read 102 Write 95.8 Mixed 54.1 SusWrite 106 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$84 26,606 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 789GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 123 126 127 127 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 84.9 Write 98.5 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 120 68% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5474-028.A00LF 4x4GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	40% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WC807AA-ABZ HPE-130it Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion WC807AA-ABZ HPE-130it

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBFE02FE02Bench 38%, 699 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48