MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A31
MotherboardMSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '17 at 03:18
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User LAO-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 60.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 700
62% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 190
Parallax 177
132% 176 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 176
Splatting 125
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
678GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 506
Write 388
Mixed 406
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 23.7
129% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 41.3
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 23.8
42% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
579GB free
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,315
Write 1,857
Mixed 1,762
440% 1,978 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.7
199% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 112
113% 184 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 278%
Great: 363%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
855GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 76
Write 77.8
Mixed 70.4
56% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.35
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
KINGSTON SHFS37A240G 240GB
145GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
121% Outstanding
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 105
137% 106 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 9.66
1,260% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 10.5
1,695% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 121%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-240 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback