Asrock Z370 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	36.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20181119
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '21 at 00:00
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 242 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 744 76% 612 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	110% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 156 Parallax 151 120% 151 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 153 Splatting 102 98% 121 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 1TB 636 User benchmarks, average bench 201% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 875 Write 1,148 Mixed 929 221% 984 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 20.4 62% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 493 DQ Write 1,469 DQ Mixed 803 665% 921 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 293%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1GB free Firmware: JKAOA3FB Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 8.5 Write 12.8 Mixed 11 8% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 69 Write 65.5 Mixed 72.3 52% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 18GB free Firmware: 01.01D02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 138 137 138 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 142 Write 138 Mixed 104 SusWrite 138 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3GB free Firmware: JKAOA3FB Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 59 67% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 79GB free Firmware: JKAOA3FB SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 13 8.1 3.6 85 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 64 Write 71 Mixed 32 SusWrite 41.4 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 1,342 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 5GB free Firmware: JKAOA3FB SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 15 27 64 52 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 61.5 Write 63 Mixed 34 SusWrite 37.4 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 37 Write 38 Mixed 28.3 44% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905701-132.A00G 4x16GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.4% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 26.2 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 23.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Pro4 - $107

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,056x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	759x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	643x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	424x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	361x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	304x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	114x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	92x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	127x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	113x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $526

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16