Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 551 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 67.6 2-Core 171 62% 107 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 628 56% 472 Pts	64-Core 2,008 124% 2,008 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7470 14,835 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 2120) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.97 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M3 240GB SSD 240GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 332 357 229 44 43 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 441 Write 347 Mixed 322 SusWrite 222 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 17.2 78% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 36.4 65% 125 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 80%
Seagate ST32000445SS 2TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free Firmware: MS02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 141 Write 41.8 Mixed 46 SusWrite 41.7 50% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 80%
Seagate ST2000NX NEO2000 2TB 2TB free Firmware: GS18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 46 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.3% Very good	Read 200 Write 46 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 45.3 65% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.13 MB/s

SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 6GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 8.5 10 9.7 9 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 18 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 10.5 23% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 2.3 185% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 16x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 16 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 31.7 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.5 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16