HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 00:52
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 162
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 460
44% 363 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 68.9
61% 73.2 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 68.3
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 3396) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 62 63 92 96 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 366
Write 320
Mixed 132
SusWrite 81.1
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 9.6
41% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 56%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
124GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 205 205 207 204 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.6% Average
Read 224
Write 210
Mixed 195
SusWrite 189
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 15.1
80% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 17
24% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 92%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
183GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 145 145 146 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 137
Write 140
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 145
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
517GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 79 70 94 97 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 147
Write 133
Mixed 70
SusWrite 92.3
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 04CB M378B5273DH0-CH9 04CB AD63I1C1624EV 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback