Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Professional Gaming (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '21 at 23:47
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 69 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 193 67% 120 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 609 59% 486 Pts	64-Core 1,022 63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3774) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.9% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 135 Parallax 123 99% 126 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 127 Splatting 114 96% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB 3,901 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT08D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 23 23 25 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 409 Write 29.6 Mixed 48.2 SusWrite 23.6 27% 128 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 17 76% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 32.2 DQ Mixed 46.1 71% 145 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 76%
AXNS381E-128GM-B 128GB 548 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 82GB free Firmware: 263j-HP SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 139 143 143 142 143 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 444 Write 122 Mixed 156 SusWrite 142 47% 216 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 31.1 110% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 90.3 89% 143 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 186GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 131 130 130 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 129 Write 121 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 130 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown=> Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 25.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 19.9 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
MX300 SATA M.2 1TBCrucial $65Bench 90%, 6,111 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	5x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	4x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $918

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16