Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '21 at 18:25
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 191
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 498
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 8.6
7% 9.07 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 337
Mixed 210
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 20.6
77% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 66.3
DQ Mixed 107
98% 156 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 163 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 134
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 166
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 114%
Generic- SD/MMC 1GB
1GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Read 8.8
Write 4.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.7
7% 5.82 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 5%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4GB
3GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.4 8.3 8.5 8.6 8.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 8.4
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback