Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 30 '21 at 08:44
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$69
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 192
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 400
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2189 MHz, MLim: 1818 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 18.3
16% 20.9 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 18.9
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 51 49 40 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 187
Write 55.2
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 48.6
21% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 8.1
84% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 90.7
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 3.4
17% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
884GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 198 196 197 196 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 175
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 196
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
294GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 68.3
Write 57.2
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 58.6
73% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 14.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback