Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 18:23
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 399
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 17.4
15% 20.1 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 18.1
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 52 39 48 40 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 306
Write 55.8
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 43.8
27% 126 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 8.2
69% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 66.2
DQ Mixed 6.6
28% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
885GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 195 195 197 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 186
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 196
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
294GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 72 73 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 73.7
Write 4.7
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 72.4
48% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 13.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback