Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 30.5 1-Core 55.7 2-Core 100 34% 62.1 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 168 20% 156 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 45%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1 100_MTFDDAK256TB 256GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0M SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 277 235 221 125 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 274 Write 259 Mixed 310 SusWrite 210 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 28.3 86% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 144 105% 137 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 Samsung M471A5143EB1-CPB 12GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 5.9 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.6 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	57x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	55x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	8x

SSD
SD9SB8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 107 samples	10x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	9x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	5x

RAM
K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 22%, 816 samples	16x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron MT40A1G8WE-083E:B 12GBHynixBench 21%, 222 samples	13x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 2,704 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16