| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Lenovo 43536H3 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | LENOVO LENOVO |
| Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140109 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 29 '21 at 21:29 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
66.3%
Good
|
56% 95.3 Pts
|
58% 493 Pts
|
100% 1623 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.97
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
12% 17.3 fps
|
15% 18.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 196 199 196 199 202 MB/s
|
55.8%
Above average
|
46% 202 MB/s
|
89% 31.2 MB/s
|
138% 177 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
16GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
25% 19.2 MB/s
|
74% 2.15 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M391B5773DH0- 16x2GB
16 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
135%
Outstanding
|
164% 57.5 GB/s
|
17% 5.87 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 43536H3 Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Lenovo 43536H3
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 8% - Terrible | Total price: $139 |