Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 214 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 832 77% 644 Pts	64-Core 1,189 74% 1,189 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Lighting 24.5 Reflection 26.9 Parallax 35.4 20% 28.9 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 31.6 Splatting 27.7 26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 287GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1378 1407 1404 1369 1394 1404 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,820 Write 615 Mixed 777 SusWrite 1,393 256% 1,151 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 46.3 155% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 512 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 398 297% 400 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 353%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2007 2042 2075 2058 2044 1915 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	304% Outstanding	Read 2,121 Write 2,016 Mixed 1,975 SusWrite 2,023 459% 2,034 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 73.4 234% 76.3 MB/s	DQ Read 640 DQ Write 379 DQ Mixed 531 390% 516 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 304% Great: 488%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 106GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 446 439 442 450 441 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 191 Mixed 335 SusWrite 443 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 36.6 128% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 348 260% 346 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 4TB 2,430 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 121 Write 21.7 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 17.5 37% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 134%
Asmt 2135 14TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 22 25 24 25 137 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78% Very good	Read 228 Write 20 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 41.6 67% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 2.7 588% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 134%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 106GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 57 24 49 48 49 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 49.4 Write 17.2 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 45.8 46% 36 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.4 91% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 37%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 239GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 18 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 38 Write 30 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 20 38% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 1.3 434% 5.73 MB/s	DQ Read 7 DQ Write 13 DQ Mixed 1.3 512% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-065.A00G 4x16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 47.4 MC Write 50.4 MC Mixed 42.5 134% 46.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 21.2 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	40x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	28x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16