Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 06:53
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 598
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 40.2
44% 53.4 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 46.9
39% 47.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA650
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 114 87 111 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 132
Write 120
Mixed 30
SusWrite 106
70% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-120.A00G 9905678-173.A00G 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 29
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 24.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback