MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7309
MotherboardMSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 240
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 65.7
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 58.7
35% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 59
8-Core 69.9
8% 64.4 Pts
64-Core 71.9
4% 71.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 4.4
4% 5.4 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 46 41 11 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.3% Poor
Read 121
Write 92.1
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 34.3
19% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 14.5
53% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 25.5
DQ Mixed 0.9
7% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD251HJ 250GB-$39
212GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 82 79 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 78
Write 83.6
Mixed 52
SusWrite 81
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Adata 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback