PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7788 |
Motherboard | MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) (all builds) |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130110 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 28 '21 at 14:13 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1090 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.1.1
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 149 138 152 172 146 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
204GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 103 103 103 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
4GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.8 6 6.1 6.6 5.6 MB/s
|
7.86%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 177x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 111x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 106x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 207x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 96x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $337 |