Asus P8H67

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67 (all builds)
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 27 '21 at 18:46
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 174 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 308 42% 312 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.1% Average	Lighting 48.2 Reflection 56.9 Parallax 51.7 39% 52.3 fps	MRender 56.5 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 46.9 42% 51.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 247 276 244 236 230 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 265 Write 291 Mixed 201 SusWrite 245 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 18.2 67% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.3 DQ Write 64.6 DQ Mixed 35.2 30% 43 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 96GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 285 301 304 289 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 359 Write 303 Mixed 294 SusWrite 286 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 20.6 74% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.2 DQ Write 51.6 DQ Mixed 54.7 38% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x8GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	166x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	115x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	16x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $424

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16