Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 07:34
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 84.3
41% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 110
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 11.7
7% 9.43 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 178 159 54 43 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.2% Poor
Read 236
Write 170
Mixed 103
SusWrite 108
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 9
37% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 12.7
12% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 48%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
439GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 120 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 118
Write 113
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 119
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-S1 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback