Lenovo 417176G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 417176G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 417176G
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130411
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJun 06 '17 at 12:46
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 138
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 174
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M
Legend(17AA 21D3) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.91
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.39 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2%
Great: 2%
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.08 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.96
2% 1.79 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1LE04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 244
Write 161
Mixed 187
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 10.8
46% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 6.02
14% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 859B CT51264BC1067.M16F 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback