Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 196 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 602 60% 488 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.38% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 4.9 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.38% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 428 428 429 412 383 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 443 Mixed 416 SusWrite 418 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 39 141% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 277 228% 326 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 175 178 178 177 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451R7AFR8A-PB 2x4GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 15 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.7 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	498x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373