Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus EX-A320M-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 23:16
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102 38,959 User benchmarks, average bench 65% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 440 59% 439 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.4% Poor	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 49.3 Parallax 42.9 30% 43 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 39 Splatting 28 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,290 Write 1,413 Mixed 1,098 283% 1,267 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 62.2 202% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 693 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 177 186% 324 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 36GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 80 114 114 58 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 505 Write 451 Mixed 427 SusWrite 152 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 0.5 105% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 7.7 DQ Mixed 45.7 50% 91 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 92%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 143GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 122 121 122 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 105 Write 104 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 121 73% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 16GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3066, 3066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 40.9 MC Mixed 35.8 113% 39.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.5 SC Write 40.3 SC Mixed 28.1 88% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	165x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	156x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	95x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	93x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	91x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	34x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	33x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16