To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 17:33
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 94.9 2-Core 180 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 696 62% 523 Pts	64-Core 880 54% 880 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)	48.5% Average	Lighting 59.4 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 59.3 48% 59.5 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 59.5 49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 728 432 432 430 431 426 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,476 Write 1,633 Mixed 1242 SusWrite 480 271% 1,208 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 47 161% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 619 DQ Write 394 DQ Mixed 565 405% 526 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 302%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 55GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 248 45 97 76 7.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Read 466 Write 409 Mixed 401 SusWrite 149 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 23.8 102% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 49.3 102% 203 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41HE4BDFA- Samsung M393B5170FH0- Samsung M393B5170FH0- EBJ41HE4BDFA- 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.2% Outstanding	MC Read 39.9 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 34.4 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	717x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	266x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	617x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	304x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16