Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock N68C-GS4 FX (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 15:12
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 65.3 2-Core 128 58% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 303 32% 257 Pts	64-Core 300 19% 300 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 59 36 9.8 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 123 Write 127 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 46.6 66% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 582GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 150 151 149 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 174 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 149 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 73GB free, PID 110c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.62% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 11.8 Mixed 13.8 SusWrite 15.1 19% 14 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.62% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 8GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	44.1% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 14.3 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	39x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	8x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
0 240GBCt240bx5Bench 50%, 1,468 samples	4x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $32Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	3x
PSD22G80026 PSD22G80026 4GBUnknownBench 22%, 22 samples	3x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 3,379 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16