Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 22:57
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 129
58% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 288
33% 260 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (75 fps cap detected)
60.6% Good
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 61
60% 70.1 fps
MRender 74.2
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 76
61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 98 80 56 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 156
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 76.3
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
543GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 149 151 150 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 154
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 149
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB
39GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Read 15
Write 14.8
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 15.2
20% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $149
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback