Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 145 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 202 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Solid 240GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1211A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 157 117 155 134 111 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 466 Write 400 Mixed 361 SusWrite 178 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 1.2 66% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 88.1 DQ Write 58.6 DQ Mixed 14.3 27% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 87%
MXUB3MLX-32G 32GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 13GB free, PID 0903 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 49 49 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 171 Write 48.4 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 48 93% 83 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	813x
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	122x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	61x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	24x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16