| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171109 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 25 '21 at 07:33 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
49.1%
Average
|
51% 87.4 Pts
|
31% 232 Pts
|
13% 210 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.2%
Poor
|
27% 33.2 fps
|
24% 30.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 233 220 203 200 198 MB/s
|
89.8%
Excellent
|
86% 381 MB/s
|
134% 46.2 MB/s
|
251% 336 MB/s
|
|
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
483GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 175 157 176 174 170 MB/s
|
96.6%
Outstanding
|
98% 136 MB/s
|
135% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX3600C17D4/8GX KHX2133C14D4/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
31.2%
Below average
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
18% 6.13 GB/s
|
30% 133 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,093 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,469x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 953x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 736x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 656x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $354 |