Atcomputers TRILINE PROFI I108

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAtcomputers TRILINE PROFI I108  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-D PLUS
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 22:05
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 179
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 311
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 90.2
58% 72.4 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 48.5
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A120G 240GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 124 140 128 143 134 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 270
Write 218
Mixed 248
SusWrite 139
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 37.4
133% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 164
142% 208 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
60GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 67 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 67.3
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRILINE PROFI I108 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Atcomputers TRILINE PROFI I108

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $194
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback