MSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B33
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 10:06
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 81.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 234
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 454
65% 477 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 39.2
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 28.2
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY ELITE 240GB
211GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 217 217 219 221 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 278
Write 14.2
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 211
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 6.9
45% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 15.3
14% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38%
Great: 63%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 98 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 420
Mixed 365
SusWrite 99.6
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 51.6
168% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 309
229% 305 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 134%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
316GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 99 97 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 471
Write 445
Mixed 360
SusWrite 99.7
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 44
152% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 236
198% 288 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 117%
Spcc Solid State Disk 3TB
107GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 95 95 96 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 61.1
Mixed 60
SusWrite 95.4
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
10GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 93 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 93.9
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 91.6
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 19.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33) Builds (Compare 1,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback