MSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B33
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 259
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 437
61% 450 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 39.2
31% 39.7 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 28
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY ELITE 240GB
211GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 217 217 218 219 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 296
Write 299
Mixed 277
SusWrite 216
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 21.9
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 110
91% 130 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 444
Mixed 368
SusWrite 98.2
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 52.2
169% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 335
246% 325 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 134%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
316GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 98 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 463
Write 406
Mixed 359
SusWrite 98.4
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 45.1
152% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 226
190% 280 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 117%
Spcc Solid State Disk 3TB
107GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 96 95 97 97 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 97
Write 63.9
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 95.8
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
10GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 96 94 94 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 66.6
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 90.8
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33) Builds (Compare 1,186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VD (MS-7B33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback