Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 08:50
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 274
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 937
87% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3557 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 238
Parallax 165
150% 196 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 155
Splatting 135
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 841 844 844 851 849 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,644
Write 2,446
Mixed 1,872
SusWrite 883
438% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 96.9
324% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 984
802% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 315%
Great: 355%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107
665GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 490 490 491 491 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 489
Mixed 445
SusWrite 490
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 58.4
200% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 129%
Great: 128%
Patriot Wildfire 120GB-$91
112GB free
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 165 125 157 163 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 428
Write 89.1
Mixed 249
SusWrite 152
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 39.5
153% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 207
166% 236 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
238GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 137 211 151 150 145 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.9% Above average
Read 190
Write 153
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 150
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 26.3
104% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 70
DQ Write 42.5
DQ Mixed 72.7
50% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$174
983GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 96 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 94.3
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 39.3
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 39.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $646
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback