Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 15:15
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,159
102% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,170
72% 1,170 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
EVGA(3842 2069) 2GB
CLim: 865 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 365.10
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 16.4
14% 19.1 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.3
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1876 1126 983 927 858 865 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2021
Write 2,087
Mixed 1,777
SusWrite 1,106
393% 1,748 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 73.6
258% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,534
DQ Write 1,267
DQ Mixed 1,394
1,046% 1,399 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 290%
Great: 347%
Team T253X2001T 1TB
381GB free
Firmware: V1.2.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 448 451 450 453 449 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 487
Mixed 447
SusWrite 450
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 44.7
168% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 252
199% 274 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 110%
Great: 105%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
237GB free
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1606 675 418 411 419 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 1,032
Mixed 1,356
SusWrite 656
233% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 75.3
267% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 1,322
DQ Mixed 1,287
971% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 223%
Great: 253%
35TTM8SSATA-512G 512GB
161GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 44 33 37 39 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 492
Write 393
Mixed 350
SusWrite 72.8
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 22.6
121% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 32.7
83% 170 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 91%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 154 152 155 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 156
Write 157
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 154
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
286% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
210GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 102 104 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 64.4
Write 54.1
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 104
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
257GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 83 80 82 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 86.4
Write 56.6
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 81.6
46% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 58%
JMicron 320GB
60GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 49 48 50 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 45.2
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 49.5
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 57%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
42GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
25% Poor
Read 80.4
Write 32.6
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 34.8
54% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.9
131% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25%
Great: 42%
WD My Passport 2626 2TB
293GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 84 84 84 85 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 103
Write 93.8
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 84.7
115% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 65%
WD easystore 2625 2TB
295GB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 66 67 66 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 113
Write 85.9
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 67.7
104% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 859B BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 859B BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 859B BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 32.1
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 30.5
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $742
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback