Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 12:21
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 225
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 600
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 7
3% 6.67 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.2% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 112
Parallax 100
77% 102 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 93.3
Splatting 85.7
74% 90.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,611
Write 5,146
Mixed 5,608
1,288% 5,788 MB/s
4K Read 531
4K Write 285
4K Mixed 205
1,218% 340 MB/s
DQ Read 1,074
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 790
616% 855 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
103GB free
Firmware: VQDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 190 176 190 194 178 MB/s
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.8% Good
Read 254
Write 203
Mixed 181
SusWrite 188
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 32.8
120% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 129
111% 163 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 82%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 112 113 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 112
Write 117
Mixed 51
SusWrite 114
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
190GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 121
SusWrite 114
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 109%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
661GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 135 134 134 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 136
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 85%
WD WD3200AAJS-60Z0A0 1TB
619GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 25 34 21 22 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 3,780
Write 12.8
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 24.9
687% 961 MB/s
4K Read 605
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
25,349% 202 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
WDC WD10 PURX-64E5EY0 1TB
283GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 32.8
Write 34.8
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 37.4
46% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 21%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
380GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 93.4
Write 96.3
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 89.4
123% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 99U5471-066.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $927
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback