Asus B85-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 10:07
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 601
62% 502 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 7
3% 6.63 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1442 MHz, MLim: 1777 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 116
Parallax 104
83% 107 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 97.4
Splatting 89.2
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,465
Write 5,004
Mixed 5,558
1,263% 5,676 MB/s
4K Read 450
4K Write 254
4K Mixed 186
1,054% 296 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 758
590% 819 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
111GB free
Firmware: VQDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 187 172 167 198 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66% Good
Read 250
Write 196
Mixed 171
SusWrite 185
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 32.5
119% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 127
110% 163 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 82%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 134
Write 116
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 114
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
186GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 152
Write 146
Mixed 125
SusWrite 120
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 109%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
661GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 135 134 134 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 145
Write 146
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 136
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 85%
WD WD3200AAJS-60Z0A0 1TB
619GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 26 36 37 16 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 4,279
Write 16.5
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 25.7
778% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 681
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
28,587% 228 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 103%
WDC WD10 PURX-64E5EY0 1TB
292GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 32.1
Write 36.2
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 37.1
46% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
380GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 94.2
Write 71.6
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 82.4
108% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
82% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 99U5471-066.A00LF 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.5
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 1,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B85-PRO GAMER - $504

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $927
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback