HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory70.6 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 08:30
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 149
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 496
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 185
Parallax 181
140% 179 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 181
Splatting 118
115% 143 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 125%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 210
Write 160
Mixed 164
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 17.9
58% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 137
118% 174 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
221GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 35 37 35 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 99.1
Write 28.6
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 35.2
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 74%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$90
34GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 119 123 131 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 127
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.6
303% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 111%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$90
57GB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 142 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 146
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 142
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.6
305% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 111%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
474GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 60 60 60 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
677GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 60 75 59 58 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS541010A7 1TB
239GB free
Firmware: A4C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 44 46 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 53
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 44.8
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
273GB free
Firmware: 0404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 16.4
Write 12.4
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 24.6
14% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
204GB free
Firmware: 0003LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 81 81 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 77.8
Write 75.3
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 80.1
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CHD-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CHD-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CHD-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 CE M... 130GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 19
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback