ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10A8S1030F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 10A8S1030F (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory	17.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$65 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 207 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 581 64% 506 Pts	64-Core 590 36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217 72,993 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(1DA2 E423) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Lighting 75.1 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 92.8 61% 78.4 fps	MRender 55 Gravity 72.6 Splatting 41.8 45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 237 Write 145 Mixed 175 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 35.3 148% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 80.1 75% 115 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 190GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 83 83 85 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 107 Write 107 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 83.5 64% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 60%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125 56,661 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 109GB free Firmware: GH2ZB550 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 97 97 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 124 Write 126 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 97.7 68% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 72%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 230GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 104 104 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 103 Write 98.8 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 104 68% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 640GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 596GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 74 Write 73 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 75.1 44% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 45%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 500GB 851 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 386GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 37.1 Write 35.7 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 39.2 47% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 20GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 14.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 17.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback