Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 17:49
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 511
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 52.2
34% 43.7 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 38.9
38% 47.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 98 96 92 93 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 461
Mixed 396
SusWrite 134
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 42.2
154% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 124%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
5GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 24 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 24.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 25.2
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%
iODD External HDD 128GB
90GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 163 162 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 155
Mixed 153
SusWrite 158
228% 178 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 10.4
1,180% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 30.2
DQ Mixed 12.2
1,504% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 143%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 029E CMZ16GX3M4X1600C9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 029E CMZ16GX3M4X1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback