Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus EX-A320M-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171205
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 22 '21 at 16:45
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$102 38,959 User benchmarks, average bench 65% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 61.1 1-Core 107 2-Core 214 69% 128 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 367 50% 372 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 878A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.3% Very good	Lighting 92.9 Reflection 87.6 Parallax 81.1 76% 87.2 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 79 Splatting 71 69% 86 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 417 Write 161 Mixed 223 58% 267 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 19.8 40% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 51.3 DQ Write 75.9 DQ Mixed 39.9 37% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 55GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 78 76 75 76 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 74.2 Write 70.9 Mixed 32 SusWrite 76.4 46% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.3% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 25 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 22.4 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	166x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	156x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	95x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	93x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	91x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	60x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	34x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples	46x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	33x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $242

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16