Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	105.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '17 at 07:40
Run Duration	346 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 132 50% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 417 42% 341 Pts	64-Core 906 56% 906 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.4% Excellent	Lighting 82.5 Reflection 121 Parallax 198 67% 134 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 179 Splatting 127 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 621GB free Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1572879 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 43 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 949 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 41 176095297577 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 17179869188 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 285 (EA) Unknown 100 100 308 (F1) Unknown 253 253 300 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	18.3% Very poor	Read 208 Write 161 Mixed 157 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 0.11 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 107%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEDMW80 800GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 344GB free Firmware: 0135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 1,823 Write 856 Mixed 1,173 283% 1,284 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 24.7 87% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 59.2 63% 105 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 224%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5228 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 645 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 49 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 59 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23393483334	81.9% Excellent	Read 500 Write 402 Mixed 417 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 24.9 102% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 98.8 DQ Mixed 54.4 64% 114 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 133%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 10.5TB free Firmware: 0960 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 115 Write 107 Mixed 93.2 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.26 106% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 10.5TB free Firmware: 0960 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 108 Write 122 Mixed 97 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.27 108% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 10.5TB free Firmware: 0960 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 115 Write 106 Mixed 95.6 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 0.28 110% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 10.5TB free Firmware: 0960 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 104 Write 123 Mixed 79.4 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.27 106% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 88%
Jmicron H/W RAID0 12TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0960 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65% Good	Read 129 Write 90.3 Mixed 111 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.14 982% 7.88 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 91%
LaCie d2 quadra 1TB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 463GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 25.9 Mixed 14.3 28% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.34 60% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-483.A00 8x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 34.3 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.1 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16