Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 704
74% 592 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX7000 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: .1.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 52 61 52 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 508
Write 660
Mixed 465
SusWrite 114
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 42
146% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 181
193% 304 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 108%
Nvme HFM512GDJTNI-82A 512GB
104GB free
Firmware: 0C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 707 707 803 730 710 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 444
Mixed 394
SusWrite 748
111% 488 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 57.1
172% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 705
544% 739 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 148%
Great: 198%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
455GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 121 124 125 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 118
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 122
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-033.A00G Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 16GB
2933, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.7% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 26.5
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 16,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback