Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 18:29
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 307
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,007
98% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,457
90% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 142
Parallax 195
111% 158 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 138
Splatting 94.7
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 574 562 558 545 539 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,471
Write 2,277
Mixed 1,632
SusWrite 611
390% 1,748 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 91
306% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1,193
896% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 285%
Great: 340%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
27GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 191 189 184 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 462
Write 189
Mixed 231
SusWrite 190
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 16.6
118% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 28.7
46% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
462GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1125 238 185 203 163 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1380
Write 1,157
Mixed 954
SusWrite 346
214% 959 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 80.9
275% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 958
DQ Write 709
DQ Mixed 321
379% 663 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 199%
Great: 282%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
121GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 448 441 442 441 442 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 454
Mixed 371
SusWrite 444
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 47.7
175% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 177
178% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 117%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
249GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 163 164 163 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 130
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 161
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB-$96
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 36.3
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 39
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $809
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback