Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 15:37
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 260
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 751
79% 635 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 117
Parallax 108
88% 111 fps
MRender 85.3
Gravity 112
Splatting 100
82% 99.2 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$51
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,084
Write 5,005
Mixed 5,284
1,147% 5,124 MB/s
4K Read 655
4K Write 495
4K Mixed 464
1,850% 538 MB/s
DQ Read 1,882
DQ Write 1,483
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,189% 1,633 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
733GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 141 141 142 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 148
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 139
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
55GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 132 132 132 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 126
Mixed 85
SusWrite 131
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $619
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback