Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$220
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 241
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 519
64% 482 Pts
64-Core 539
36% 539 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 108
Parallax 100
82% 103 fps
MRender 79.7
Gravity 106
Splatting 94.5
83% 93.6 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 104%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 6,189
Write 6,107
Mixed 6156
1,376% 6,151 MB/s
4K Read 529
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 226
1,182% 309 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 884
727% 1,053 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80
733GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 141 142 142 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 171
Write 147
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 141
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$38
55GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 131 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 123
Mixed 79
SusWrite 131
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback