Today's hottest deals

HP 110-210

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 110-210  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B18
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 11:42
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Memory 34.8
1-Core 21.2
2-Core 44
21% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 56.6
8-Core 74.8
8% 65.7 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 101 110 100 76 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 164
Write 63.6
Mixed 131
SusWrite 91.8
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 10.3
30% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 56%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB
30GB free, PID 0158
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
9.68% Terrible
Read 16
Write 13.2
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 13.7
19% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
101% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 16%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
7GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 15.5
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 17.2
25% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.3
140% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5.9
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 228
18% 228 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 110-210 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 110-210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback