Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '21 at 21:41
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 597
59% 482 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 21.5
13% 28 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 13.7
12% 14 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EDFM20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1036 1038 516 208 205 205 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 822
Mixed 1,040
SusWrite 535
197% 881 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 52.2
212% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 750
537% 693 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 171%
Great: 246%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 99 73 115 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 139
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 106
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 84.4
Write 92.3
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 100
114% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.2
158% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD D4H4GS26A8 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.7% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 19.9
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback