Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 13:45
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 27
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 111
37% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 355
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 12.4 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6256G 256GB
191GB free
Firmware: EDFM20.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 648 209 200 203 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 803
Write 964
Mixed 888
SusWrite 400
172% 764 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 42.3
148% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 494
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 388
292% 394 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 120%
Great: 246%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 98 96 90 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 122
Write 115
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 98.9
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
204% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 100 98 98 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 14.8
Write 59.6
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 98.6
92% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD D4H4GS26A8 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.9% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.5
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback