Medion MD34687

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Medion MD34687 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B550A4-EM
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 70 1-Core 121 2-Core 233 77% 141 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 648 65% 527 Pts	64-Core 657 41% 657 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 9548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.9% Average	Lighting 54.1 Reflection 54.4 Parallax 52.9 44% 53.8 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 50 Splatting 45.3 38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 256GB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 253 154 151 153 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 758 Write 576 Mixed 556 SusWrite 215 117% 526 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 21.7 70% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 45.4 36% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 188%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB 5,390 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 150GB free Firmware: S4200102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 411 422 433 439 411 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 416 Write 428 Mixed 360 SusWrite 412 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 39 126% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 272 226% 325 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 130%
SDHC Card 8GB 4,464 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 20.9 Write 8.2 Mixed 5.5 12% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 27.6 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 24.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 101 39% 101 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34687 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Medion MD34687

CPU
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $98Bench 68%, 93,718 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	3x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 256GBBench 153%, 253 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	3x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KHX3200C16D4/4GX 12GBSamsungBench 70%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16