Medion MD34687

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Medion MD34687 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B550A4-EM
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '21 at 19:21
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 54 1-Core 47.9 2-Core 174 49% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 672 66% 539 Pts	64-Core 671 42% 671 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 9548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.9% Average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 54.8 Parallax 52.7 44% 53.9 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 45.2 38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 256GB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 254 252 239 259 192 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 801 Write 608 Mixed 556 SusWrite 266 124% 558 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 22.1 69% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 36.7 DQ Write 62.5 DQ Mixed 44.6 35% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 188%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB 5,390 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 157GB free Firmware: S4200102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 410 421 432 436 377 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 422 Mixed 402 SusWrite 404 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 69.2 4K Mixed 38.5 135% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 357 DQ Mixed 272 227% 327 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 130%
SDHC Card 8GB 4,464 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 21.4 Write 8.2 Mixed 6.7 13% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 27.8 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16.6 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MD34687 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Medion MD34687

CPU
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $98Bench 68%, 93,718 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	3x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
E12-256G-PHISON-SSD-B16-BB1 256GBBench 153%, 253 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	3x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KHX3200C16D4/4GX 12GBSamsungBench 70%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16