HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory13.4 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 41.1
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 48.5
25% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 46.2
8-Core 41.8
6% 44 Pts
64-Core 43.7
3% 43.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3646)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 121 126 127 118 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 186
Write 133
Mixed 151
SusWrite 123
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 17.6
64% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 147
112% 151 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 ID:02 9E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 ID:02 9E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 ID:02 9E CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 5
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback