Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.2
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 20 '21 at 07:52
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 138
2-Core 233
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 813
80% 654 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1097) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 103
Parallax 8.7
6% 39.5 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1312 1348 1337 1333 1311 1305 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,453
Write 2,312
Mixed 1,764
SusWrite 1,324
440% 1,963 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 81.3
264% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 879
665% 900 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 302%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 24.7
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 26.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.2 Builds (Compare 536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback