Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	12 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151014
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '21 at 18:17
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 86.4 45% 68.6 Pts	4-Core 86.6 8-Core 86.8 12% 86.7 Pts	64-Core 87.6 5% 87.6 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3647) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 205 69 61 68 68 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51% Above average	Read 253 Write 241 Mixed 232 SusWrite 117 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 25.7 89% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 137 103% 138 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 121%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1TB free Firmware: MPAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 66 66 66 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 109 Write 121 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 66.4 59% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 72%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 58GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 12 9.3 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	20% Very poor	Read 96 Write 28 Mixed 37 SusWrite 12.1 47% 43.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 52GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $100Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	30x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $64Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117