| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Cirrascale VB1416FM (all builds) |
| Motherboard | GIGABYTE GA-7PESH2 |
| Memory | 24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180626 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 18 '21 at 18:01 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
74.3%
Very good
|
67% 117 Pts
|
62% 518 Pts
|
109% 1,763 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
|
21.6%
Poor
|
21% 28.3 fps
|
23% 27.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 403 400 395 392 382 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
75% 333 MB/s
|
87% 29.5 MB/s
|
153% 230 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.4 3.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
|
4.77%
Terrible
|
13% 11.5 MB/s
|
11% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.3%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
26% 9.2 GB/s
|
52% 76.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds